Search options (Page 3 of 7)

Not much to add for me.

The guy is a freak.
That's what you are called today if you stand by your own opinion, even if it hurts. The channel would perhaps be one of my favourites if I was into music ...

It wouldn't matter to me from which manufacturer the "reviewer" accepts a pre-payment. All reviews would be tainted in my eyes.
BTW, didn't visit the discussed channel for about two month now.
And I passed a chance to buy a used Alibow bow last week.

Wetting the sandpaper ?
The stuff sold here (at least that with fabric backing) can be used dry and wet, this is explicitly noted on the backside.

Wood is an anisotropic material. When trying to carve it from a single piece, the fibers need to go along with the shape, or it will break immediately.
Or you can use the plywood approach - 3 or 4 thin layers, with the fibers crosswise. I actually have a bow with siyahs made this way. Perhaps you can replace one layer with glassfiber.

I reckon that fiberglass bows, as Alibow's tiny one, are plain fiberglass limbs wrapped with leather. Nothing laminated.
I don't have much experience as bowyer on my own, but there are (other) archery fora which cover such topics extensively, even horn/sinew composites. And last but not least, you might find hints on YT.

I started a somehow similar project month ago, for a special club event that never materialized. It is a more Manchu-sized bow, with plain split bamboo as limbs. Perhaps going to finish it someday...

Because of a 30 per cent discount in my favourite shop, I bought a 35# Nomad KTB recently.
Technical details are similar to a Carbon Forever bow from White Feathers, so a direct comparision seems in order.
Only the Nomad is 48", the Carbon Forever 53" (henceforth called CF). I choose the 53" variant of the latter, which is also available in 48".

Both are from Freddie Archery, and look very similar. Limbs are covered with an identical fabric. The CF has a smaller grip, wrapped with what looks like thin leather. The Nomad grip is bigger, and covered with a straw-colored pimpled rubber. It looks ugly, but feels more comfortable, and gives me better control then the CF grip.
The rest is again quite similar. The Nomad looks a bit more elaborate, yet mostly plastic details.
Performance-wise, there is not much difference. I got the impression the CF has slightly more punch, doing better with the heavy wood arrows I use. I didn't shoot them back-to-back, though.
If I find the time, I do a speed and distance measurment over the turn of the year.

In conclusion, very similar bows with very similar characteristics. The Nomad used to be about 20 per cent more expensive here. It seems you only pay that 20% for looks, not performance.

Recently found out the person running the YT channel discussed her mostly doesn't like criticism too much.
On occasion of a "zombie" video filmed on the outdoor range, I commented that my bow would easily reach the neighbouring residences behind the targets. Censorship was swift ...

Yes. Not really impressive in comparison, but not bad either.
If there was a distributor here in Europe, I would perhaps consider getting one for training. But shipping costs from Asia tend to destroy price advantages.

Interesting/strange bow data:

If the draw weight at 28" is correct, that would mean a tiny 1# increase of draw weight per 3 inches. Most bows I know have about 3..4# per inch for that range.
But I assume the 30#@28" are not correct.

Just to be explicit, I do not think there is money flowing for this reviews in the background.

Trying to think in the shoes of both sides:
As a bowyer, I would double or triple-check a bow before sending him to a independant reviewer. A (more or less) open platform like YT reaches hundreds or thousands of potential customers, so mistakes quickly damage your reputation.
And as a reviewer, you are tempted to be nice, or else the bowyer might drop you for his next bows. So don't dig too deep, and don't be too meticulous.

More than a decade ago, I had subscibed to a computer magazine that did quite comprehensive reviews. They bought the stuff anonymous, and called things as they are. As one might guess, they were not really loved accross that industry. But all watered down through the years, and they are doing the ubiquitous "Word and Excel tricks" now.

I brought compounds up, as an obvious and extreme example. Many distributors/shops who do YT reviews have written contracts with manufacturers. And as I heard, some (compound bow) manufacturers even forbid dealers to put certain other brands in their shop. A healthy competition, it seems ...

I remember that, but listened "with a half ear", as we use to say here. Not sure if he spoke about the past or the future.
Anyway, I had been thinking about such a bow (or similar long draw) as well, but deferred it indefinitely. Also because of the comments here. I have a local alternative (Vegh distributor), were I have the option of try-before-buy. Even if it's a bit more expensive.
My lightweight glassfiber bows from Alibow still hold up quite well, though.

As said, the foam limbs are quite common in the olympic world, especially ILF limbs. Some fellow archers in my club shooting them - on metal risers.
That's another thing that looks interesting, but some while ago I realized I had spread myself too thin, trying too much bows and arrows. Which is not very helpful for form and precision, I think.

Yes, I think it's becoming better.
However, I still miss a test on distances greater than 10 meters, and a kind of long-term test.
The first one would be easy, as he has videos from his outdoor range. And good mediterranean archers do blank shaft test at least at 10m and 20m, because it usually takes 20 to 30m for the arrow oscillations to settle.

But perhaps I'm too harsh, because testing is an important part of my day job. And a good tester tries to "break" the product without exceeding it's limits.

To put my words cautiously - the YT channel is a very good marketing platform for the "attached" bowmakers. The products are not tested in a too tough manner...
I'm into compound shooting as well, and I noticed the same in this niche. Only with much more money involved. I quickly learned to discern sales-pitches-by-proxy from real reviews.
At the end of the day, it depends on the "due diligence" of the potential customer.

I approached this issue from a mainly "energetical" view. Being famous as good archers, their arrows supposedly had a proper "punch", even against armour equivalent to medieval periods. This implies draw weights comparable to the Manchus and English, assuming similar stature and performance.
Deducing the approximate draw curve from preserved bow fragments (as done with other bows), it should be possible to conclude if it was used with a mediterranean style (26..28") of thumb draw (30"..34"), ignoring the short ottoman draw here for a moment.
Kinetic energy is proportional to draw length (actually, draw length minus brace height), which enabled me to shoot 400gn arrows with competitive performance on a "weak" 25" bow. And draw length beyond the chin would IMHO suppose thumb draw, at least in mounted archery.
The English used a 30..31" finger draw in war, but only for unprecise "arrow hails" and clout shooting.
Just my 2 cents...