26

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

ragnar wrote:
JGH wrote:

I can also shoot GT warrior 400 spine, but need a lot of torque.

I suspect this is a form issue, with insufficient follow-through. This was my problem for months as well.
If you do not keep up the back tension throughout the shot, the bowhand comes inward at the release. I tried to counter this issue with torque as well.
Correcting this problem - existing with other styles I practice - removed the need for explicit torque.
As said, a mentor or trainer would be helpful.

Thanks for your reply. Well 800 spine works really good, with just a little bit of torque. But I believe that you are right regarding back tension. With the Kaya - we measured 3 times with a 32" arrow nocked in 60 lbs - I popably just have so much back tension that the bowhand automatically goes to the left on release I believe. With the 42 lbs otf of the WF this just seems not to happen automatically. Need to work on this. I just saw on a korean webpage that they seem to specify a different arrow for each length/lbs combination, so Koreans seem to very finely tune the arrows to their bows.  Also the HMG is sold as RH and  LH in Korea, they seem to be tillered off center. Only the "export" bows are offered ambidex. Would love to be able to shoot such a bow with the proper tuned arrows one day. Maybe that is the reason why they only need a little bit of torque...?

27

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

ragnar wrote:
JGH wrote:

The new 30lbs bow tends to shoot quite far to the right with 600 spine arrows, tried 1100 spine and these go far left.

Spine numbers of 1100 are quite high, better be careful. Especially at full length.
Not that I'm a magnificent archer, but spine has not much effect on my shooting. I shoot arrows between 400 and 800, on bows between 25 and 40lbs.
One difference is arrow weight, of course. That makes a visible difference at the max. IFAA range (60yds).
And bad shooting. "Bad form" usually means, I collapse on the shot (relaxing back tension during release).

JGH wrote:

Armin Hirmer has tested the Daylite Monarq, which looks identical to the WF Forever Carbon But I don't know if it has the HM Carbon Layer.

I noticed this as well. Perhaps they produce the WF bows for the European/Western market, with WF being just a brand name. This not uncommon in the archery industry.
The WF bows feel harder to draw than the Kaya or Freddie bows of the same draw weight, I think.


Measured draw weight at full draw this weekend:: 40lbs Kaya at 31.5"=60 lbs, shoots like a rocket, 30 lbs WF forever carbon at 33 inches:42lbs. WF draws very smooth all the way to 33 or 34".
I use 33" Skylon Edge 800 spine, 4.2gpi with 75gr tips and 4iinch feathers on the WF. Much easier to shoot now, arrows fly a lot straighter. I can also shoot GT warrior 400 spine, but need a lot of torque. From what I can see all White Feather, Daylite and Nomad bows are made by HMG in Korea

28

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Ok, thanks, will try to find out more on the text you mentioned. As said, I'm not shooting korean bows cause I'm interested in history, just like to shoot that way. I'm interested in archery, but Olympic style does not look very interesting to me.
But on the other hand I am still generally interested in history, and love to learn more about ancient technology.

29

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

geoarcher wrote:
JGH wrote:

Trickshooting to entertain the Sultan, yes good possible...

More like the reality.  I had a discussion years ago with Bede Dwyler (an excellent researcher) over at the old ATARN forum before it was transferred over to FB and became what it is today.  He had some good info to share based on historical accounts regarding all this trick shooting:

Bede wrote:

Shooting displays as part of military themed public entertainments were well documented and in Mamluk times furusiyya manuals detail what types of performances were expected. Whether in archery, lance work or swordsmanship, the high level of skill needed is obvious from reading the texts. These were opportunities for warriors to show off their skills to their masters and for the sultan and the amirs to show the skills of their troops to the assembled people. This does not mean the performances were exact replicas of real battle techniques. It was more like the entertaining and complex marching done at the Edinburgh Tattoo rather than what the same soldiers would do in battle.

Some of what is referenced in Arab Archery's stunt section has real applicability to warfare.  Some of it not so much, and would have just been more of a show off thing.  If you are critical enough, and understand the bows and arrows made and used during this time, you can pick apart yourself which is which when going through this section in Arab Archery.

Regarding Arabs and arab archery you are propably right. But this is only a small part of this planet, and only a small amount of time if you look at how long humans use weapons. How much do we really know on how did Huns, Avars, Mongols, Vikings, Persians used bow and arrow, and especially how did they practise to become such good warriors. You just can't start on day one you use a bow by killing enemies. Arabs were a very well organised culture, where books and training manuals will have existed. In other parts of the world this did not exist. Old saxons as an example were not organised, they only elected leaders in wartime and formed alliences between some tribes, but there was no Sultan, no King, no military education, every tribe did things different. We don't even really know how the old saxons and angles, who spoke a language similar to that we use here on that forum used bows. Yes there are reports from some romans that state that germanic tribes did not use bow and arrow in war. But is that true, and if it's true, was that only true for the 20 years he had a chance to observe that, or for 10000 years back... We see today how fast things can change. Just look at the last 70 years since WW2 how military tactics and technology have changed.

30

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Maybe you are right, maybe wrong as we don't have any written texts from former times. Trickshooting to entertain the Sultan, yes good possible, even today people earn money with that. Still everything else is also possible. During my military service we had radar controlled 40 mm cannons with uranium heads for air defense. Still, more or less for fun we also practised shooting at planes (they were towing a target dummy, of course) with machine guns - which looked to us like children toys compared to our weapon system and practised a more or less instinctive shooting technic, which even worked quite well at a distance of 1500 m. Don't think that you can win a war that way, but nevertheless it was a good experience that you can hit something at that distance with a simple machine gun and a very basic sighting system.

31

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

I believe that there must have been a lot more to archery during times we don't know anything about, but bow and arrow were a lot more important to the survival of humans before humans became farmers. Arab archery and this Saracen stuff is really good, but only a very small portion of the knowledge that must have been there in former times when humans were mainly nomadic hunters. Trickshooting might always have been practised just as a training for hunting or war, even if war weapons had to be stronger. If you look at dinghy sailing:during a race you don't do any tricks, but in training you do everything, just to get a better feeling for your boat, waves and windshifts and become a better racer.

32

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

geoarcher wrote:
JGH wrote:

In two weeks I will propably not be able to remember why I ever had that problem..

In 2 weeks, you may improve so much that you may not need to worry about these things and just shoot the bow.  A lot of it is just feeling your way through.

Most propably. Many seem to struggle for a long time. Maybe these rememberings will help some other beginners when I have long forgotten this stuff.

33

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

geoarcher wrote:
JGH wrote:

But you say torque is not a rotation of your wrist, but more a rotation in the shoulder to get the whole bow to the left?

No I never said that.  We have discussions on torque here in the technique section of the forum and I'll provide the links below:

http://www.koreanarchery.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=816

http://www.koreanarchery.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=231

http://www.koreanarchery.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=612

The guy named joomong gives a very good succinct explanation albeit with a few confusing words that I'll leave out here: 'If you....grip the bow lightly, and when full draw, you twist your wrist CCW slightly'. 

So I'm in agreement that its all in the wrist.  There's also a video on youtube about somewhere that provides a very good explanation and footage of the technique in action.

I think that I've seen most of these videos. Still not that easy to copy for a beginner like me, and I've also seen a lot of discussions on that topic.

Regarding the problems I had for now I can only guess:

1. Lighter bows need more torque than heavier bows
or
2. The limbs of the Kaya are a lot wider near the riser, but  thinner at the siyah, maybe the HMG just needs more torque
or
3. it is just related to the shape of the handle.
4. Some spine related stuff
5. The 30lbs is bigger.. 53 vs 50
6. a combination of all of this...

No idea. In two weeks I will propably not be able to remember why I ever had that problem..

34

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

geoarcher wrote:
JGH wrote:

Be it with....Khatra....

Khatra's purpose is not to get your arrow flying straight as can be.  Read Saracen Archery....

I'm also a bit interested in history, but that is not my main goal to try thumbrelease shooting. For me it's the most archaic and natural way of shooting and includes a lot of mind related stuff. If I just wanted to punch holes accurately in paper I would most prooably use some kind of office equipment and not olympic recurves, and if I wanted to shoot some kind of modern style I would try and get a G3 gun as we used during military service, or a modern crossbow. Olympic archery seems very far from what bows and arrows were used for the last 20000 years in hunting and war, let's say survive. And while this Saracene Archers stuff is very interesting, this is propably only a very small part of the knowledge that existed to survive as a human race for 10 thousends of years. I also believe that Koreans speak Korean but not Arab, so the word Khatra might have been unknown there for thousends of years. Our knowledge is very very small, maybe during some times most people were able to shoot like Lars Anderson, just cause they had to in order to survive.. who knows?

35

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

geoarcher wrote:
JGH wrote:

Be it with....Khatra....

Khatra's purpose is not to get your arrow flying straight as can be.  Read Saracen Archery....

Seems to be a lot of confusion on the net on what is Khatra, what not and also Torque I understood as a preloading of the wrist, so that the string moves to the right, and the riser maybe only half an inch to the left, which in my current feeling is enough to get a straight arrow flight. But you say torque is not a rotation of your wrist, but more a rotation in the shoulder to get the whole bow to the left? If I do that I currently also can get a straight arrow flight, but when I overdo it, arrow goes to the left, if I am to slow arrow goes to the right. For now I prefer to just preload the wrist cause I belive that this is much more cinsistent, as long as the preloading is always the same. But hey, I'm still a beginner  who is just testing stuff... maybe in two weeks time I have a complete different way if shooting.

36

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

In the meantime I manged to get it right. Just need a lot more torque than with the 40lbs, or I need to do something that Armin Hirmer would call excessive forced Khatra or no Khatra. (Moving the bow hand to the left when I release). Also putting the hand more diagonally on the grip helped. On the 40 lbs I shaped the rubber. In the lower part it is more like an egg, while in the top i had cut it nearly down to the riser. Pressing with the root of the thumb and pulling with the pinky is therefore maybe a bit easier, and the grip is generally a bit more diagonal. Also the rubberband of the Kaya has a better antslip, so the torque stays the same between shots. The leather band of the WF is a bit slippier, so I need to check for correct grip after each shot. Whereas I have the 3 Finger distance between string and bow arm on the 40lbs, I need to have 2 to 3 times as much for the 30 lbs to get a straight arrow flight. I always check the arrow before each shot for too much bending due to draw hand index finger pressure, so that is unlikely to be the problem. As said, I am just a beginner with archery, so it may also be that I still do everything completely wrong, but as long as I can hit the target I don't care too much for now. Still interested to get everything right and get better. Can't believe that you can hit a target in 145m without some technique to get a straight arrow flight.  Be it with back tension like Armin shows with Manchu bows, Khatra, torque or spine tuning, or some other technics that I don't know of.

37

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Thanks.
What is the meaning of "lob" (sorry long time ago that I learned english at school)?
I'll try the soft arrows and some heavy and stiff 400 spines as well. Had the same problem - while more consistent with the 40 lbs Kaya in the beginning - the 400 spine flew always far to the right, now it's no problem anymore. Shows quite well if you are able to get the riser out if the way, no matter how this is done or called.
Maybe I also need to modify the grip of the WF a bit as I did on the Kaya, to get a more consistent gripping.

38

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

strawanski wrote:

No reply from Kaya yet...

From the descriptions I get from you and on other pages I tend to believe that Kaya might have the better overall Quality and shooting experience with a smoother draw.
But the customer service seems not that good, what makes me think that in case of a bow failure they might not be easy to deal with.
Please tell me if that's a wrong assumption.

But due to that feeling I just wanna throw in the Nomad Black Shadow. Any experience and comparison to the nomad KTB or Kaya KTB?

I only know the two bows that I own, but if you are in europe you might check the big distibutors ssa archery in Belgium and JVD in the Netherlands. Any dealer around europe should be able to sell the korean bows they offer. It is indeed very difficult to understand the differences between the bows. Armin Hirmer gives you some infos on YT. If I were in the US I would propably contact bluelake..
At the moment I would buy a Kaya again, but I don't know if the Hwarang or YMG is not much better.. Armin also made a video on this one.

39

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Thanks for your response. I'm just really a beginner in Archery trying to learn stuff. I'm not really using FB. As far as I understood spine should be quite irrelevant with good technique. I am already testing many different arrows, and with the Kaya I already can shoot anything from 800 to 400, different thicknesses, weights, length and materials and they still group. So I know spine does not really matter, as long as the arrows are not to soft.  I actually bought the lighter 30 lbs bow to improve my form, and expected that I can shoot instantly more accurate with it, which somehow just does not work that easy. Don't really understand yet why it is like that. If this has to do with back tension, arrows or the grip of the bow or something completely different. Maybe it would be better to go for far stiffer arrows than to go the soft spine route. I don't know yet, but I'm willing to find out. Or better forget spine completely and concentrate on improving form?  I am happy about any advice. I used to work as a trainer/instructor in other complex sports, so I'm trying to find a way for myself to master this stuff as fast as possible. More or less I'm more interested in how can I teach myself and understand it in the most efficient way than only to be able to master asiatic style of shooting after some years of practise. I believe that in ancient times the ability to train new soldiers so they can be useful in war as fast as possible must have been of great interest. Don't know what information exist on this topic. Can you tell me what is the right way of Khatra? When I see videos from Armin or Murat they talk about different styles. And what do you mean with misinformation?

Best regards

Gerold

40

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

I'm trying all Khatra styles, but use mainly sideways, which works just fine with the 40 lbs  Kaya. With FW Khatra I somehow don't get a good arrow flight yet, and arrow goes down.. does not feel that good. Normally shoot 600 Spine 4.2mm ID, works just fine with the Kaya. . 400 spine warrior went to the right with not so good Khatra, but with better Khatra flies the same as the 600 spines. On the 30 lbs the 400 spines Warrior flies better than the 600 spines. Worst is a 5.2mm ID 600 spine which slaps really hard against the riser. Need to get better Khatra on this bow or maybe  either stiffer or softer arrows. Just saw a nice video on this topic on YT by Bamboo Archery of Malaysia which explains the topic quite well. They also advise to try a more "dirty" release by twisting the string.. I'll try that tomorrow..

https://youtu.be/XKIpXr32kP4

41

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Spine numbers of 1100 are quite high, better be careful. Especially at full length

I know, they are Avalon Tyros with vanes that belong to my 20lbs Polaris. Was just a try, as someone here on the forum wrote about KTA and Spine. Have a lot of trouble with the 600 Spine 31,5" arrows on the 30 lbs WF compared to the 40lbs Kaya. With the 40lbs Kaya I can hit a 40cm Field Target @ 20m without problems, mostly 40% of arrows in the gold or close to it, rest on the 1 and 3 but on the target, while form is not really good as the bow is generally far to heavy for me. With the 30lbs WF arrows are all over the place, group far to the right. With bad Khatra you can hear the shaft touching the riser. Managed now to hit the center with starting new with close distance torba and moving slowly back to 12m. My unconscious mind can compensate for  the right grouping, but as soon as I get the arrow into my view picture, my whole shooting breaks down as I need to really shoot badly to the left. With the 40lbs I can line the arrow up with the gold and will hit close to gold. With the 30 lbs if I line the arrow up with the target the 600 spine arrow hits 50 cm to the right at 15m distance. The 1100 will hit 30 cm to the left of the gold. It is possible to compensate for all of this by purely instinctive shooting, but it's really hard as soon as the focus goes on the arrow for a second I can start over again with Torba at 1,5m distance to get my instincts right.

Maybe this might also have to do something with my cross eye dominance, I don't know. Will try to shoot lefthanded to see if this is working better. Hope for the 800 spine arrows to arrive tomorrow, hope that these work better. Ordered 3" Impulse vanes and 4" natural feathers for them, will try out what works better. Does anybody know which vanes are used in Korea?

42

(102 replies, posted in Bows)

Hi,
I'm also a beginner with Archery, and started with KTA. My first bow was a Kaya Black Cat 40lbs 50". I can draw it to 31. Cause I thought it was much to heavy (measured 45lbs at 30, and more than 50lbs at 32) I thought to add a lighter bow to work on my form and got a WF Forever Carbon at 30lbs. This one measured 28lbs at 30" and 36lbs at 33". I can draw 32 with this one. Still the 50 Kaya feels somehow more natural, so I don't know if it was good to go to 53. Accuracy got even worse with the new bow. Might need more training. In hindsight I propably would have gone with a 35lbs 50 Kaya. Then you might get easier into proper back tension, so Khatra becomes less of a problem. Still, to bring the draw arm into proper position, europeans might need a longer bow. The new 30lbs bow tends to shoot quite far to the right with 600 spine arrows, tried 1100 spine and these go far left. Will try 800 spine 33" Skylon Edge or try to get my Khatra more consistent. With good Khatra 400 spine is no problem. The Black Cat looks more high quality, only the grip was far to big, but you get an extra rubberband that you can fix after shaping the grip. Grip on WF is a lot smaller, fits well for my smaller hands, but is "harder" and has a leather style band already glued on. Prefer the Kaya handle. Armin Hirmer has tested the Daylite Monarq, which looks identical to the WF Forever Carbon But I don't know if it has the HM Carbon Layer. As said, I'm just a beginner, and these are my first impressions after one week with the WF. As far as I know these WF are sold as HMG in Korea.